For decades, the “chemical imbalance” theory has dominated how we understand and talk about depression in the United States. You’ve likely heard it from doctors, advertisements, or mental health organizations: depression results from a chemical imbalance in the brain, particularly involving serotonin. This explanation has been promoted to reduce stigma and encourage medication use—but what if it actually does more harm than good?
A groundbreaking experimental study by Dr. Brett Deacon and his colleagues, Joshua Kemp and James Lickel, provides compelling evidence that the chemical imbalance explanation might inadvertently worsen people’s outlook on their depression and recovery prospects.
The Study: Testing the Chemical Imbalance Theory’s Impact
The researchers conducted a clever experiment with 73 participants who reported experiencing past or current depression. Participants were given a bogus but credible “Rapid Depression Test” that supposedly analyzed their neurotransmitter levels. They were then randomly told one of two things:
- Their depression was caused by a chemical imbalance in their brain (specifically, low serotonin levels)
- Their depression was not caused by a chemical imbalance (all neurotransmitter levels were normal)
The researchers then measured how these different explanations affected participants’ beliefs about their depression, including:
- Self-blame and stigma
- Expectations about recovery (prognosis)
- Perceived ability to regulate negative moods
- Perceptions of different treatment options
Key Findings: The Surprising Downsides of the Chemical Imbalance Explanation
The results challenge many conventional assumptions about the benefits of the chemical imbalance explanation:
1. No Reduction in Self-Blame
Despite expectations that biological explanations would reduce self-blame, participants who received the “chemical imbalance” feedback felt just as responsible for their depression as those in the control group. This contradicts a central rationale for promoting the chemical imbalance theory.
2. Increased Pessimism About Recovery
Participants told their depression stemmed from a chemical imbalance showed significantly more pessimism about their prognosis. They viewed their depression as more chronic, more uncontrollable, and more likely to require long-term treatment compared to those told they did not have a chemical imbalance.
3. Decreased Belief in Ability to Self-Regulate Mood
The chemical imbalance explanation significantly reduced participants’ confidence in their ability to manage their own negative moods, especially through cognitive strategies (like changing one’s thinking patterns). In other words, believing depression is caused by brain chemistry made people feel less capable of influencing their own emotional states.
4. Preference for Medication Over Psychotherapy
Participants given the chemical imbalance explanation rated medication as both more credible and more likely to be effective than psychotherapy. In contrast, those told they did not have a chemical imbalance viewed both treatment approaches as equally credible and effective.
Why This Matters for Your Mental Health
These findings have profound implications for how we think and talk about depression:
- Causal explanations influence treatment choices: Believing your depression is caused by a chemical imbalance may lead you to favor medication while undervaluing potentially effective psychological treatments.
- Hope and expectancy matter for recovery: Research consistently shows that positive expectations about treatment and recovery lead to better outcomes. The chemical imbalance explanation appears to undermine these important factors.
- Self-efficacy impacts coping: Feeling capable of managing your own mood influences how you cope with depression. The chemical imbalance explanation may reduce this sense of agency and control.
What Can You Do With This Information?
If you’re struggling with depression or supporting someone who is, consider these evidence-based suggestions:
Embrace a Biopsychosocial Understanding
Rather than viewing depression as purely biological, consider the interplay of biological, psychological, and social factors. This broader perspective acknowledges biological influences while recognizing the role of thoughts, behaviors, relationships, and life circumstances.
Maintain Hope for Recovery
Remember that regardless of its causes, depression typically responds to appropriate treatment. Most people experience significant improvement with effective interventions.
Consider All Treatment Options
Don’t automatically dismiss psychotherapy if you’ve been told you have a “chemical imbalance.” Research shows that cognitive behavioral therapy and other evidence-based psychotherapies are as effective as medication for many people with depression—and often have longer-lasting benefits.
Foster Self-Efficacy
Even if biological factors contribute to depression, your thoughts and actions still matter. Learning skills to manage negative thinking, engage in meaningful activities, solve problems effectively, and build supportive relationships can significantly impact your mood.
Moving Forward
The research by Dr. Deacon and colleagues adds to a growing body of evidence questioning the helpfulness of the chemical imbalance explanation. While simplified biological explanations may seem reassuring, they can inadvertently foster pessimism and passivity.
A more nuanced, empowering approach recognizes that depression involves complex interactions between biological vulnerabilities, psychological processes, and social contexts—and that meaningful improvement is possible through multiple pathways.
This article summarizes research from: Kemp, J.J., Lickel, J.J., & Deacon, B.J. (2014). Effects of a chemical imbalance causal explanation on individuals’ perceptions of their depressive symptoms. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 56, 47-52.
Leave a Reply